The news broke this week that 21 year-old Liam Staley has received a custodial sentence for his posts on the social networking site Twitter concerning the collapse of Bolton player Fabrice Muamba. As a result, there has been intense debate on the internet and in the media as to whether or not the 56-day custodial sentence is too excessive.
Speaking as a European citizen, I think it’s safe to say that we take freedom of speech for granted. We know that, within reason, we are free to express our views and opinions to each other providing they do not incite a contravention of currently-established laws. The Muamba, however, brings up a legitimate issue. Staley claims that he was drunk when posting the messages on Twitter and it is important to take this claim into account. Alcohol lowers the brain’s inhibitions and can cause many an embarrassing situation. However, talking from personal experience, when I am drunk I do not insult people based on their gender or ethnic origin.
Nevertheless, we have to ask whether or not Staley received an appropriate sentence. While I abhor any form of racism, sexism or the like, the incident brings up the question of just how far we are legally able to go within the boundaries of free speech.
Freedom of speech has no middle ground, which seems to be something that the government does not understand. Either a country has complete freedom of speech where every citizen has the right to express whatever views they may have, regardless of how offensive they may be to other people, or a society in which every word and thought is closely regulated by the state.
Of course many would argue that most governments operate under a policy of “being free to do what they tell you” and that would be a fair assessment. But I believe we should trust in people to be intelligent enough to make their own minds up.
Lastly, FTD wishes Fabrice a speedy recovery!




