Posts Tagged ‘film

12
Jan
09

Tempura, misogyny and torture, oh my!

As promised, here’s the first installment in what I have opted to fondly name “Goreweek ’09″: I review some of the most notorious films out there for your amusement.

Luckily, I’ve been blessed with something of an iron stomach.  The first proper “horror” film I can remember seeing was Spawn, although this wasn’t my first actual “gore” film.  That was Romero’s Dawn of the Dead.  I remember feeling violently queasy after watching the infamous disembowling scene.  This was at 12 years old.  Since then my tastes expanded to the Evil Dead series and several obscure Japanese films.  Thanks, Dad.

Today I’ll be reviewing Takashi Miike’s infamous “Ichi the Killer”.  So sit back, relax and enjoy.

Although the film is indeed called Ichi the Killer (Ichi being the Japanese name for the number 1), the central character is a sado-masochistic Yakuza enforcer called Kakihara who is looking for his boss’s killer who just happens to be the eponymous Ichi.

I won’t spoil the whole plot for you, but here’s a little stab by stab lowdown as to just how viewing pans out for the viewer.

0.05 : A woman has had the shit beaten out of her and the film’s title has just formed out of a puddle of come.  Delightful.

0.30: Can I smell Tempura?

TEMPURA?! WHERE?!

TEMPURA?! WHERE?!

The film then descends into an orgy of violence, torture, misogyny and some really crazy fucking plot twists.  believe it or not, the gore isn’t that bad.  It’s campy, over the top, silly.  And that’s the way it should be.  I just can’t say that I feel all that comfortable with the portrayl of women in the film.  One woman gets raped and beaten, then killed.  Another one says she fantasizes about being raped… whatever.  I’m split about the movie.  It disgusts and compells me; because the scary thing is that Miike actually does know that he’s fucking with a lot of conventions.

If you’re a gore fan, I’d watch it, but take it with a pinch of salt.  Good film though.

09
Jan
09

Well then, children.

I await next week’s Gore-a-thon 2009 with anticipation.  Remember now, I’m going to be hurling and putting myself through pint after pint of fake blood for YOUR amusement.  But now, a public service announcement.

Viedemerde.fr is a unique site for French-reading  intarweb users aimed at raising your spirits by reminding you that no matter how shitty your life could be… it’s just not THAT bad.  Some unique excerpts from the site:

Today I was invited to dinner at my girlfriend’s parents’ house.  When her father told us all how proud he was of his girl still being a virgin, I almost choked.

Today, after looking after my 9 year old nephew, my girl and I jumped on the sofa and engaged in a passionate and torrid wrestling bout.  It was at that moment that the Lion King DVD on the TV decided to stick on one of Scar’s lines: “What would your mother say?  What would your mother say?”

Today it snowed  and I was in a car accident.  Luckily, I wasn’t responsable, but I’m wondering how to explain to my assurance people that a snowboarder ran into my car even though I was stationary on the road… In Marseille.

See?  Life ain’t so bad.

Laters,

J

20
Jul
08

Hollywood’s Lactation Fetish

Oh god, there is no way to fully explain how much I hate these so called “baby films”, I.E. Daddy Day Camp and the like.  Hell, for all the laughs that they gave me, Juno and even Knocked Up ultimately boiled down to a film about goddamn babies.  They drool, they fart, they shit all over everything; how is this funny?

It seems that the newest film to exploit the masses of drooling 18-30-something adults is the latest release from the leaking mind of Hollywood : Baby Mama.  Hell, even the title makes me want to start killing kittens and other small animals.

But seriously, what is this seemingly unending infatuation with films about pregnant women?  I can only really equate it to a lactation fetish.  I mean, what’s so entertaining about a bunch of moody pregnant women with strange food cravings?  Surely it’s the cry of the breeders?

I mean, don’t get me wrong.  Children annoy me, what with the screaming and the smelliness, but I do realize that they are kind of important if we want to keep on living.  I just don’t see the appeal of watching preggo women cry and make snide remarks for an hour or two.

Maybe I’m missing something?

27
Jan
08

Inside a killer’s mind

I absolutely love the film Red Dragon, starring Edward Norton, Anthony Hopkins and Ralph Fiennes. While the insane Hannibal Lector is indeed the focal point of the film (as well as the whole trilogy), I find him to be rather mundane. The character who interests me the most would have to be the character of Francis Dolarhyde, AKA The Tooth Fairy. While this may seem like an amateur psychoanalysis, I’m merely trying to figure out how Dolarhyde’s mind works from the wonderful adaptation of Ralph Fiennes. It’s worth noting that I haven’t read the book, nor have I seen the previous adaptation of the film by Michael Mann, where Thomas Noonan played the role of Dolarhyde. This is going from what I have read about the character and what I have seen in the film Red Dragon.

First of all, like all classic movie serial killers, Dolarhyde has had a traumatic childhood. This is in part due to a facial deformity (in actuality a hare-lip), which could possibly mean that he was teased as a child, though the film gives no indication either way. After a botched re-construction surgery, he is left with a long scar running up to his nose, which has also resulted in him being rather sensitive about people touching his face, as evidenced by the way he acts with Reba.
He was put into the care of his grandmother in her foster home. Through various audio flashbacks throughout the movie, we learn that she repeatedly threatened to cut off his genitals, presumably after several bed-wetting episodes. Other emotional abuse is hinted, though we are not told whether or not he was physically abused as a child. As is typical of most Hollywood serial killers; the abuse provokes a deep-seated fear and apprehension towards his grandmother, but also a sort of affection. How do we know this? The main indication would be the dentures Dolarhyde possesses. He holds one set of dentures for his normal life, and another set, snaggle-toothed and sharp which resemble the dental structure of his grandmother. He wears these dentures when he slips into his Red Dragon alter-ego, in other words when he commits the murders. This suggests that in some form or another, Dolarhyde sees himself as carrying out his grandmother’s wishes, or even that she is now a part of him.

Dolarhyde possesses two radically different personalities. In public he appears to be a shy, confused young man who doesn’t have much -if any- of a social life. Other than this, he appears relatively normal. In some ways, this could be an extension of his childhood personality: young, innocent and eager to learn about the world around him.
Then along comes his Red Dragon persona. Now this side of his split personality is perhaps the most interesting. To fully understand It, we need to analyse this quote:

“I am the Dragon. And you call me insane. You are privy to a great becoming, but you recognize nothing. To me, you are a slug in the sun. You are an ant in the afterbirth. It is your nature to do one thing correctly. Before me, you rightly tremble. But, fear is not what you owe me. You owe me awe”

Within this statement, we see a lot of confusion, which can help us decipher the Red Dragon personality. Here we have a being that is confused by the world around It. While it holds without doubt a certain disdain for the people around It, It cannot comprehend why others do not recognize It for the superior being It is. “You owe me awe!”; while Fiennes pulls this line off with utter contempt, I feel that it is perhaps more appropriate to highlight the confusion within that statement, indeed so that the Dragon is saying “Why aren’t you in awe of me?” instead of just stating.

While on the outside, The Dragon may seem like a monster, an uncaring amoral being; It has perhaps more ‘noble’ (in the loosest sense of the word) intentions. Through various statements he makes during his conversation with the journalist Lounds, we can see that he believes he is “transforming” his victims, as he shows Lounds pictures of his victims through each stage of their transformation. This could suggest that he believes that by killing them through his bizarre ritual, he is freeing their true spirits from their body, allowing them to undergo a metamorphosis, such as he is trying to attain, and changing them into higher beings. This may also hint that he is somewhat envious of his victims, as to him they are able to achieve superiority in a matter of minutes, while he has been working all of his life to achieve his metamorphosis, becoming the Red Dragon. The thing you have to remember is that each personality is a completely different person, while Dolarhyde is aware of the Dragon, he fears it and he doesn’t actually want to hurt people. To be honest, I don’t think that the Dragon Itself is fond of hurting and killing people; but he views it as a necessary evil in order to achieve It’s proper transformation. It looks down upon Dolarhyde with a certain sense of pity; as it views Dolarhyde as weak and spineless. It’s important to remember this; as you can easily lose yourself in hating the character instead of trying to understand it.

So there you have it. And I bid you Adieu




Blogcatalog

Recent Readers

View My Profile View My Profile View My Profile View My Profile View My Profile

A warning

Any hate mail will be ruthlessly exploited for my amusement. Thank you.

Blog Stats

  • 62,412 foolish mortals trapped in my web of insanity!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.